Mad Dog wrote:
Your such a tool.
You are the one name calling...
Mad Dog wrote:What's that got to do with anything. Truth is, the 70's was a dark time for Detroit. Just take a look at the tire shreading 165 HP Vette.
Basically everything, you drive around in that POS 4 banger Shitstang and ill drive that super unimpressive V8 Vette and lets see who gets more attention from Vagina, or is Vagina not your "thing"?
Mad Dog wrote:That's what we got in good ole Cali.
The Repubilic of Kommiefornia is the most poorly run, Lib ruined, state in the union, move out or stop bitching...
Mad Dog wrote:
Detroit was lost and building underperforming cars across the board.
GM never put a 4 banger in any muscle car Ive ever seen. The 6 pack Camaro and Turbo T/A were the closest thing but they still looked like the V8 version at least.
Mad Dog wrote:This is when the Japs came in and well, we know what happened.
Ive seen a N/A Civic do nines, see if you can get that 4 banger "Cobra" in the 9's with no boost...
Mad Dog wrote: You look foolish.
No shit? Thanks for pointing that out, I had no idea, I apologize...
Mad Dog wrote:You want to spout off stats about this and that with out any real world experience. Go drive a Camaro and then a Mustang and get back to us.
Uhh, I have, tons of both and Firebirds, GM FTW!! The baddest Rustystaing I have personal experience with was 900hp, BIIIIGG blower. Closest a F*RD has ever gotten to beating me in a drag race/top speed run. The fastest still was the Twin Turbo SS Camaro I didnt pass by him till close to 170mph, now thats smokin! Word is that car will go over 200mph so if the road was long enough he would have caught me eventually...
Mad Dog wrote:You tout the IRS vs. the solid axle, and then criticize the OHC, 4 valve for its' technology and praise the archaic OHV.
Correct, IRS smokes solid, you disagree?
Criticize OHC? I LOVE OHC thats what makes my 450 smoke your archaic 500. The baddest Vette ever made was the ZR-1, qwad over head cam, 16 fuel injectors, that thing was bad ass, Lotus knew what they were doing! But look how expensive hopping that motor up is. The LS series motors are dirt dirt cheap by comparison to the OHC F*RD. So that tiny advantage the car has stock would easily be eclipsed as soon as the hop-ups started rolling in. Plus from a "tuner" standpoint, which motor would be easier to make fast programming wise? Put a cam, TB, MAF and a chip in the LS setup and then compare that cost to $$$ ratio to the F*RD...
Mad Dog wrote: Your about as transparent as a politician trying to get reelected.
Im the least transparent person that ever walked the planet...
Mad Dog wrote:All the stats and mags don't mean spit.
The only thing that really matters is what floats your boat when you put the pedal to the metal.
We agree on something else? WEIRD!