CPI pipe -where are the conclusive results?

All Engine, Clutch, Chains, and Sprockets Stuff Here.
speedway501
Posts: 62
Joined: November 28th, 2009, 9:11 pm
Last active:

Post by speedway501 »

They were different bikes on different days as well.
User avatar
MojoScojo
Posts: 1796
Joined: June 8th, 2007, 8:42 pm
Last active:
Location: Rathdrum Idaho

Post by MojoScojo »

100hp honda wrote:
speedway501 wrote:Ran a bone stock CR500 with a CPI pipe and Pro Circuit 304 silencer on the dyno. It made 58.4 rear wheel hp. Advanced the timing about 2 degrees and increased jet size from 170 to 172. A stock standard CR500 with standard pipe on the same dyno ran 51hp (not the same bike). Both engines were fresh. The Dyno is a Dynamics brand.
same thing i said 3-4 months ago with seat of the pants dyno. everyone laughed it off as bullshit. suckers :lmao:
:roll:
No longer have a CR500.
07 Yamaha YZ250, 17 Husqvarna 701 Enduro
Get on with riding or get on with dying.
https://www.youtube.com/mojoscojo
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

Roostius_Maximus wrote: cams were degeed, balancers were marked correct, everything, same ignition ran on both
And?
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
MojoScojo
Posts: 1796
Joined: June 8th, 2007, 8:42 pm
Last active:
Location: Rathdrum Idaho

Post by MojoScojo »

M.F.D.B. wrote:
Roostius_Maximus wrote: cams were degeed, balancers were marked correct, everything, same ignition ran on both
And?
Roostius_Maximus wrote:1 liked 37 degrees, one 31 i think
No longer have a CR500.
07 Yamaha YZ250, 17 Husqvarna 701 Enduro
Get on with riding or get on with dying.
https://www.youtube.com/mojoscojo
100hp honda
Posts: 4394
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 6:57 pm
Last active:

Post by 100hp honda »

MojoScojo wrote:
100hp honda wrote:
speedway501 wrote:Ran a bone stock CR500 with a CPI pipe and Pro Circuit 304 silencer on the dyno. It made 58.4 rear wheel hp. Advanced the timing about 2 degrees and increased jet size from 170 to 172. A stock standard CR500 with standard pipe on the same dyno ran 51hp (not the same bike). Both engines were fresh. The Dyno is a Dynamics brand.
same thing i said 3-4 months ago with seat of the pants dyno. everyone laughed it off as bullshit. suckers :lmao:
:roll:
problem is you clowns have used fmf your entire lives and cant image something out there is better, so you critisize and laugh. :lol:
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

MojoScojo wrote:
M.F.D.B. wrote:
Roostius_Maximus wrote: cams were degeed, balancers were marked correct, everything, same ignition ran on both
And?
Roostius_Maximus wrote:1 liked 37 degrees, one 31 i think
yeah but what were the dyno #'s? Timing has a lot of veriables:

Spark plugs arnt perfect.
Were the plugs indexed?
Where the combustion chambers CNC matched? polished?
Spark plug wires the same? etc. etc.

I agree with others on the dyno part, it has to be the same motor, same day and exhaust gas analyzer tuned (fuel/air) in between each changed of exhaust...
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
MojoScojo
Posts: 1796
Joined: June 8th, 2007, 8:42 pm
Last active:
Location: Rathdrum Idaho

Post by MojoScojo »

100hp honda wrote:
MojoScojo wrote:
100hp honda wrote: same thing i said 3-4 months ago with seat of the pants dyno. everyone laughed it off as bullshit. suckers :lmao:
:roll:
problem is you clowns have used fmf your entire lives and cant image something out there is better, so you critisize and laugh. :lol:
Really? Personally, I have zero problems accepting that CPI may be a better pipe for blah blah application. I honestly don't even care. My only problem with your statement is your choice of "proof". 2 completely different engines being dyno'ed. Means absolutely nothing. Thus, :roll:.
No longer have a CR500.
07 Yamaha YZ250, 17 Husqvarna 701 Enduro
Get on with riding or get on with dying.
https://www.youtube.com/mojoscojo
User avatar
MojoScojo
Posts: 1796
Joined: June 8th, 2007, 8:42 pm
Last active:
Location: Rathdrum Idaho

Post by MojoScojo »

M.F.D.B. wrote: yeah but what were the dyno #'s? Timing has a lot of veriables:

Spark plugs arnt perfect.
Were the plugs indexed?
Where the combustion chambers CNC matched? polished?
Spark plug wires the same? etc. etc.

I agree with others on the dyno part, it has to be the same motor, same day and exhaust gas analyzer tuned (fuel/air) in between each changed of exhaust...
Ah. Understood.
No longer have a CR500.
07 Yamaha YZ250, 17 Husqvarna 701 Enduro
Get on with riding or get on with dying.
https://www.youtube.com/mojoscojo
100hp honda
Posts: 4394
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 6:57 pm
Last active:

Post by 100hp honda »

MojoScojo wrote:
100hp honda wrote:
MojoScojo wrote: :roll:
problem is you clowns have used fmf your entire lives and cant image something out there is better, so you critisize and laugh. :lol:
Really? Personally, I have zero problems accepting that CPI may be a better pipe for blah blah application. I honestly don't even care. My only problem with your statement is your choice of "proof". 2 completely different engines being dyno'ed. Means absolutely nothing. Thus, :roll:.
look man ill spell it out one more time, since you missed it the first time i explained it 3-4 months ago. i had a fmf pipe on my bike, without doing any changes what so ever i put the cpi on, ( i didnt even change jetting ). instant power increase. felt like 8hp just like they claim, in reality maybe it was only 6, i dont know because i didnt dyno the difference but it was a significant amount. i was simply agreeing with the other guys statement of the 7hp gain. cpi kicks the shit out of any other pipe avalable to the normal person, including the gss.... no offense glen. if a guy wanted to get real crazy he probly could have matt shearer or mike at cpi build a better performing pipe than the current cpi but it would be a mother fucker to make fit in the chassis or possibly impossible to make it fit into the chassis. if the pipe wont fit in the chassis, nobody would buy it, cpi took that into consideration and built the best they could while still making it appeal to the average guy. everything clear now ? :D .
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

same sparkplugs, same wires, same distributor, same fuel pump, checked with the same carbs, same headers, same intakes, and same conditions

Image

Image
User avatar
AlisoBob
"Hoon-father"
Posts: 15404
Joined: May 31st, 2007, 6:39 pm
Last active:
Location: Aliso Viejo Ca

Post by AlisoBob »

Did engine #2 have a S/H ignition on it??
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

AlisoBob wrote:Did engine #2 have a S/H ignition on it??
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

Roostius_Maximus wrote:same sparkplugs, same wires, same distributor, same fuel pump, checked with the same carbs, same headers, same intakes, and same conditions
With around 14lb ft. more on one motor I bet its either a better casting of the heads or misalignment with the gaskets. I think you guys should swap around the EGT probes to see if the big variation in EGT is the probes or is a result of unbalanced fuel/air mix to the cylinders. I bet if you swapped the heads the dyno numbers would switch too..
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

ya, i doubt the heads were the issue, they were checkd, block was decked, intakes were machined to match, the gasket is never an issue, cometics on both. we even adjuted the rockers again to make sure something wasnt goofed
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

Roostius_Maximus wrote:ya, i doubt the heads were the issue, they were checkd, block was decked, intakes were machined to match, the gasket is never an issue, cometics on both. we even adjuted the rockers again to make sure something wasnt goofed
You would be surprised how much variation in port dimension you can get from "core shift". Did you "cc" the ports on both heads? I bet you will see a wide variation unless the heads have been ported and flow matched...
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

:roll:
dont woory, we didnt index the plugs either :roll:
User avatar
AlisoBob
"Hoon-father"
Posts: 15404
Joined: May 31st, 2007, 6:39 pm
Last active:
Location: Aliso Viejo Ca

Post by AlisoBob »

M.F.D.B. wrote:
You would be surprised how much variation in port dimension you can get from "core shift". Did you "cc" the ports on both heads? I bet you will see a wide variation unless the heads have been ported and flow matched...
This isnt a 1954 Edsel were talking about is it?
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

Roostius_Maximus wrote::roll:
dont woory, we didnt index the plugs either :roll:
:shock:
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
M.F.D.B.
Posts: 2960
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am
Last active:
Location: Sin City

Post by M.F.D.B. »

AlisoBob wrote: This isnt a 1954 Edsel were talking about is it?
:wink:
Faster then Speedy Gonzalez, slower then the Road Runner!!! MEEP MEEP

2002 CR80
1999 Cr500
2003 CR250R
2005 CRF250R
2006 YZ450F
2005 CBR1000RR
1997 Banshee
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

torque killer!
very peaky, takes the power 1000rpm higher, and after that did add 5.5hp, BUT the torque was down everywhere!
with no silencer we lost 18ftlbs from what the fatty had done and gained 4hp, with the silencer we only lost 3ftlbs but gained 5.5hp, it was still 1000rpm later.
at 10000 the cpi made 2hp more than my fatty at 10000

I'm officially NOT a CPI guy

FATTY!

btw, this engine i put in sunday made 1hp more than my friday engine, but gained 7ftlbs of torqure, moved the delivery of both down 1000rpm, made it pull unbelievably smooth, extended the over rev from 8500 to 10000, and is good on fuel if my 5.5 hours of riding had anything to say.
The TTM bike from Team DNS will be running this porting.
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

the 39pwk made2hp more than the 41 right from the bottom, but the torque curve was 2-3 higher and wider with the 41, both peaking within .1 of eachother. They were both looking for the same jet, we couldnt do anything but take power away by messing with where i have it.

I foolishly didnt try the pc pr gnarly, but that'll be coming. I'm going to run my 86 engined '88 withthe gold series, bored pj, carbontech reed. the 2000 thats epoxy modded in the transfers,gnarly +vf2+bored pj, and the 1999 that bro rides thats stock with a pc pipe and shortened pc silencer. sometime in the next week or 2
User avatar
hoofarted
Posts: 2628
Joined: July 2nd, 2007, 8:48 am
Last active:
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA

Post by hoofarted »

Good to hear the final result. Guess thats why its a dunes pipe.

I'm +1 on the Fatty as well. That coupled with 250 ignition = good times!
The CR500 is an acquired taste. If you don't like it, acquire some taste...

Image
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

stock port timing, stock port dimensions at the sleeve, both engines setup to achieve 0 deck, stock reeds, stock boot(blended to fit the 41carb) 88 250 ignition, fmf fatty pipe, fmf silencer. the green dyno is fridays engine, its an 87 based crankcase and a 89+jug with the sleeve cut down to fit the older cases. both have identical machined exhasut ports.


Image
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

I wasnt chasing the biggest HP with this porting, looking for torque and to move it down in the rpm, did it, and the delivery is smooth like my 03 250, it doesnt rant, it doesnt give the big pipe shutter then start working, it yanks on you from everywhere
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

temp was 18c friday when i tested, 28c lastnight :shock:
Post Reply