89 CR500

cmotodad · Post by **cmotodad** » March 12th, 2010, 7:31 am

Am thinking about another AF. Have a chance to pick up an 89 500 very cheap from a friend. What are the pro's and con's to this year. How much different than the 96 motor I have now. Thanks Bob

Hillbilly500 · Post by **Hillbilly500** » March 12th, 2010, 9:06 am

there are a few posts on here in regards to motor differences.. 89 is a great motor to use for the swap though

kelroy_leon · Post by **kelroy_leon** » March 12th, 2010, 9:20 am

If you end up getting that 89', would you be interested in selling the triple clamps ?

Post by **AlisoBob** » March 12th, 2010, 9:28 am

'89 has the "close ratio" tranny... Good for MX and trail riding.... not good for the Dez, unless you like dust in your teeth.

Its a good motor, buy a 48 tooth sprocket at the same time.

cmotodad · Post by **cmotodad** » March 12th, 2010, 4:52 pm

How much difference is there in the ratio's between the two? And are the motors close to the same in horsepower? Thanks

CR500R7 · Post by **CR500R7** » March 12th, 2010, 5:01 pm

Horsepower wise there is not that much in it.
Going on claimed Honda figures 85 CR500 61hp, 01 CR500 65hp the 89 is somewhere in between.
I know one of these was claimed to have 63hp, either 87, 88 or 89.
I personally wouldn't worry about the horsepower figures the 89 Cr500 engine should work just fine.

JBaze · Post by **JBaze** » March 12th, 2010, 5:04 pm

Hps are the same for the most part, but there is quite a difference in the top end.

seanmx57 · Post by **seanmx57** » March 12th, 2010, 6:17 pm

cmotodad wrote:How much difference is there in the ratio's between the two? And are the motors close to the same in horsepower? Thanks

The ratios are basically the same except for fith. 1,2,3 are identical, 4 is .95 vs 1 and 5 I don't have memorized, bad hoon.......

Look in drive tech for that info at the top prolly

The other difference is the clutch is the old style basket, less plates so no rekluse if you care about auto clutches. You can change to new style but it will set yuo back a few hundred clams.

Up side is power according to legend is better than the 90+ and the cranks are supposed to be lighter than the newer motors.

homenf · Post by **homenf** » March 12th, 2010, 6:19 pm

JBaze wrote:Hps are the same for the most part, but there is quite a difference in the top end.

As far as the engine itself or the powerband?

JBaze · Post by **JBaze** » March 12th, 2010, 6:22 pm

I am prolly gonna get flamed, but I always felt the power on the 89-91 a little snappier than the later models. Prolly due to the close ratio low gears
but for trails and hare scrambles in Wa. the close ratio was perfect. For the Dez or wide open you'll be seeking another gear

nmdesertrider · Post by **nmdesertrider** » March 13th, 2010, 6:45 am

We have bikes with both types of trannies and it doesn't make much of a difference. I don't think you will care unless you are doing 80 on dirt roads.

cmotodad · Post by **cmotodad** » March 13th, 2010, 7:54 pm

Does anyone know if a new style cdi box will work with an 89 old style tuna can? Thanks

Travis · Post by **Travis** » March 14th, 2010, 4:33 am

I ride an 89 and have looked for another gear on the road but it is great in the woods. lol

BannedCR500Riders.com

89 CR500

89 CR500

Ignition