thoughts ?

Use some common sense ....
Post Reply
100hp honda
Posts: 4394
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 6:57 pm
Last active:

thoughts ?

Post by 100hp honda »

i been thinking how to make the exhaust eliptical shape without getting too close to the edge of the transfer. i dont hold everything in gordon jennings book as gospel because i dont think he wants to give every joe blow the thumbs up to modify their motor to the max, but he mentions not getting closer than .350" or theres a chance of short circuiting unless the transfer is aimed sharply toward the rear of the cylinder. ive seen cylinders that im pretty positive are much less than .350, just wondering if anyone knows first hand what or if anything detremental happens when you get narrower than .350" ?? heres kind of what i want to do, the green arrow shows the area in question

Image
User avatar
AlisoBob
"Hoon-father"
Posts: 15404
Joined: May 31st, 2007, 6:39 pm
Last active:
Location: Aliso Viejo Ca

Post by AlisoBob »

Do yourself a bigger favor, and remove the bridge....
100hp honda
Posts: 4394
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 6:57 pm
Last active:

Post by 100hp honda »

good point and theres no question there would be benefits from removing it, but to keep the rings from snagging, the exhaust shape must be very precise. im going to leave it in, for now atleast
User avatar
AlisoBob
"Hoon-father"
Posts: 15404
Joined: May 31st, 2007, 6:39 pm
Last active:
Location: Aliso Viejo Ca

Post by AlisoBob »

If your running a weisco, the bridge is releived to the point the rings arent touching it.


If its .oo4" away, or not there at all.... whats the difference?????
User avatar
iggys-amsoil
Posts: 3602
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 6:09 pm
Last active:
Location: Just North of March Airfield CA

Post by iggys-amsoil »

Thats what was done to mine. .350? mine could be less but you won't know for another two years or so. :lol:

As for removing the bridge, maybe the second to last bore or the last one. What the hell either a new sleeve or cylinder anyway.
Post Reply