dannygraves wrote: We're a bunch of grown men here, act accordingly.
Who you accusing of being 'grown' ???????? Im a kid and always will be.
I was wondering when someone was going to say somethingdannygraves wrote:damn Freemer... relax a little dude, everyone is entitled to an opinion here, but you are acting like a little kid with the name calling. We're a bunch of grown men here, act accordingly.
Slow old Fart wrote: What you are seeing is that in motorcycling there are is a need for 2 types of chassis the XR was never it.
whats the bore and stroke dimensions on your bike in the vendor site?glen howell wrote:I look at one every day laying on work bench, ask sabre he has seen them also have 2 extra cyls. These were expermental 5 years ago and we couldn't get any interested people who wanted to spend $5000. to build one I have part numbers for sleeves, and pistons in stock at present. there is a pic of one of these monsters in the approved vendor site. Glen (TEAM GSS) NAHA #42
With enough money you can win on anything.Caseys500 wrote:Slow old Fart wrote: What you are seeing is that in motorcycling there are is a need for 2 types of chassis the XR was never it.
Thus the multiple Baja victories your'e right "the XR was never it."
Where do you stand Slow? sometimes you say nothing will touch the late 80's CR500 chassis...and earlier in this post you were talking up a gen 3 CRF conversion. You have put down aluminum "tubs" in every thread on this site. Im confused!
I know that when I put my 88 motor in this 97 CR250 frame, it made a world of difference. I get better traction and this frame cuts like a knife compared to my 88 frame.
You have said that the aluminum frames are horrible in the sand...that is my favorite place to ride and is where I notice the biggest (being the best) difference.
I have to agree with Freemer, other than the vulgarity. You are regurgitating what you have read about the bikes...anyone can do that, but what you are continually saying is the opposite of what I have actually observed with my personal conversion bike...from actually riding it. If it wasnt actually better then my 88 then I would have just put the motor bck in the 88 and sold the 97 rolling chassis for a lot more then what I bought it for...but it is better and that is why so many people are doing the conversions.
Danny is right...no reason for name calling and putting someone down...we are all hoons but freemer has a valid point and I have yet to see a picture...and not one pulled from a random site on the net.
We are all proud of our bikes and post pics at a whim.
That'd be the cat's ass if we could get that thing to shit out 100hp reliably.MrDude_1 wrote:heh, i only read the very start of the thread, and stoppped, but i know what slow is talking about... the 500 needs more power, and when you have tires that hook everything, and gearing for a hair over 100, you the stock 500s hit is easy... throttle response is great, but it doesnt snap like it does with offroad gearing a loose traction (aka great traction offroad)
that 60-100 hp hit is close to what sport bikes have... you just stay in your little 100hp band as you ride... and drop it below that when you need less. no problem on-road.
i want a upgrade... something around 100hp would be near perfect.