dumb questions . . . .

All Engine, Clutch, Chains, and Sprockets Stuff Here.
Post Reply
User avatar
other
Posts: 338
Joined: January 25th, 2010, 5:11 am
Last active:
Location: Perth Hills, Western Australia

dumb questions . . . .

Post by other »

Ok, don't blame me, it's all Jack Daniels fault . . . . . Just fitting the Roosty decomp head on my 90 CR500, and notice the different casting numbers, ML3R and ML3N . . . . I KNOW I've read this somewhere before, but for the life of me I can't remember what the difference was . . . . Experts step up to the plate now !
OK, rip the piss out of me for my ignorance now . . . . . . . Oh, and thanks for your help in advance !
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

HF,HF-1,ML3,ML3-N heads share the same narrow squish, ML3-R heads came out in 1992 with a wider squish, likely compensating for running pump gas.

R head chamber on the right, alll previous versions left

Image
User avatar
Roostius_Maximus
Site Admin
Posts: 4641
Joined: November 16th, 2007, 3:24 pm
Last active:
Location: Mt Nebo, Manitoba, Canada
Contact:

Post by Roostius_Maximus »

the narrower squish head was better, it also let the boost port charge reach the sparkplug instead of deflecting out the exhaust port. the narrow squish head had lower wider dome, both were the same cc if measured without the shelf thickness.
User avatar
other
Posts: 338
Joined: January 25th, 2010, 5:11 am
Last active:
Location: Perth Hills, Western Australia

Post by other »

Thanks Adam. Guru of all things CR5, as usual ! Any sign of billet covers or Fedex price yet mate ?
Post Reply