Page 1 of 1

new style(92) pivot bushings in older(87) case

Posted: February 11th, 2010, 8:06 am
by cr750
Im putting an 87 500 engine together to go in my 92 chassis and i know most people have the swingarm pivot bushing machined out to fit the larger bolt, but im thinking about boring the case and pressing the larger bushings in. Is there something i dont know? or will this work? the aluminium is gonna be much easier for me to drill.

Also, its a .02 over 87, stock porting and head, will it be a little quicker than the scalloped 92 engine? and would you suggest using the later thin head gasket?

Thanks

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 4:33 am
by CR500R7
I'm sure Danny drilled the cases on his 86 engined Gen1 AF useing a 13/16 th drill bit.
Check with him and get the low down on it.
Yes, this will work if done properly and then use the larger bushes.

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 6:27 am
by Roostius_Maximus
you need to use a boring head, not a drill bit so you can get the proper pressfit, i've done them like that a few times

As long as the engine is tuned as good as it can be it'll be as fast, possibly faster, but theres no reason to look for something else.

you'll probably have too much compression with the thin gasket on that head, i'd cut the head, but i'd ride it first and see if it needs more compression, doubt it.

first thing to check is that the low style pipe you have clears the reed block area, a fatty wont, but a pc or gnarly should

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 12:29 pm
by nmdesertrider
No problems here with a regular drill bit

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 7:25 pm
by JR650
i just drilled mine too. i was damn careful about it, but it worked.

Posted: February 12th, 2010, 7:40 pm
by Nodge
I used a drill bit on one engine, and it worked fine.
I used the same bit on another engine and it cracked the case half when I was gently tapping in the "bushing"

Posted: February 13th, 2010, 6:08 am
by asteroid500
ive done 2 engines with a bore hole drill in the mill

Image

Image

Posted: February 15th, 2010, 1:30 pm
by cr750
Drilled it and it pressed right in with no cracks, guess I got lucky this time :shock:

So, should I go with the 92 head on it then? anyone know the approximate difference in volume?

:o , didnt think about the reed cage flange being longer. 8mm (or .3149 inches) difference according to the parts comparison link, not very much. I dont think it will be an issue, but you say it will hit on a fatty? I trust you, ill have to take a look when I get her in. You think ill have much trouble with the carb getting in there, I figure the boot will flex .315 inches.

Posted: February 15th, 2010, 1:50 pm
by britincali
You need a newer style intake manifold, not only are the older ones shorter but the angle will make the airbox boot interfere with the shock.

Posted: February 15th, 2010, 2:12 pm
by cr750
Ill be using the newer reed cage, air boot, air box etc. The 92 chewed the piston, spit some out the bottom ruining the cases. I have this mostly complete 87 engine, cylinder was just bored 20 over with new piston. never put the 87 back together because the covers are the usual rotten magn so I will be using the newer covers and newer clutch, and I swapped to the larger bearing in case for the newer trans shaft. Im going to try and use the 87 4th and 5th gears as well. many thanks

Posted: February 15th, 2010, 4:17 pm
by Roostius_Maximus
cr750, email me, got some questions about those cases, and can give you some help swapping in those gears

Posted: February 23rd, 2010, 2:04 pm
by cr750
got it back up and running :D , I used the thinner late model head gasket so combined with the scallop-less cylinder and the 87 style head it is a hard kick. It is considerably harder hitting than the 92 motor that was in it, prolly due to the fact the other was worn out, or the porting on the 87 is better, either way you can tell a pretty big difference.

The fatty pipe went on with no issues what-so-ever, like I figured, why do some folks have problems with it?

my camera is fucked so it will be a while before I can post some pictures of the thing

Posted: February 23rd, 2010, 5:09 pm
by Roostius_Maximus
my fatty was new with papers stil, hit so hard i changed jugs

Posted: February 23rd, 2010, 5:40 pm
by cr750
this one is probly as old as 92', lol, or whenever they changed the name from fat boy, finish isnt that great any more but no holes or dents :shock: so ill let it ride, i kinda like that extra hit on the low end, it is Real close at the reed block but it dosnt hit

Posted: February 23rd, 2010, 5:58 pm
by cr750
the 4th and 5th gear helped out my topend pretty well also, guess i can put the stock sprockets back on it, im probly seeing triple digits with 5th toped out, got some good ole watery eyes on it earlier :)

Posted: February 24th, 2010, 6:47 am
by dannygraves
:wink: I personally like 14/49 gearing on a stock w/r gear set. still relatively low in the tight stuff and you can still do like 80mph on the fire roads

Posted: February 25th, 2010, 12:37 pm
by cr750
I have a 14,13, front and 48, 53 rear to play with, it currently has, get this, 16-40 :shock: , guy I bought it from had it geared to supermoto or somthing. Ill start by trying 14-48, since you suggested 14-49, I rarely need to go over 75-80 anyway, but it was fun to buzz up the road a couple times though :o

Posted: February 25th, 2010, 12:43 pm
by dannygraves
wow, that some serious gearing!
I ran 14/48 on my dunes bike, that should be a good starting point.

Posted: February 25th, 2010, 1:12 pm
by cr750
yea, when he told me a 16 front i didnt believe it, but when i got a look at it it is big and i counted all 16, it dosnt have any markings so i figured it to be custom or somthing, thanks for the advice on the gearing danny