Page 1 of 1
Poll: Which pipe would serve me best?
Posted: July 15th, 2011, 8:45 pm
by plynn41
I'm building a new engine for my AF conversion. Long rod, ported with fairly conservative port timing. Bike will be used for MX exclusively.
What pipe and silencer do you folks recommend. Obviously, the opinion of those of you that have tried both FMF and PC, and/or other options on their 500's is most valuable to me. All I'm finding new is the FMF Gnarly and Pro Circuit.
I'm not against buying something used, but it would have to look pristine.
Thanks in advance!
Posted: July 15th, 2011, 10:33 pm
by cmotodad
I use a PC but have used a Gnarly too.My motor is stock and I prefer the PC as it seems smoother when the track dries out. What type or who did the port work for you? Thanks Bob
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 12:23 am
by dannygraves
the pc will give you more high end rip and so probably getter throttle control. the gnarly comes on practically at idle and produces awesome torque but is less controlable.
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 6:21 am
by knobby668
Give the DEP a try. It runs like a FMF and Pro Curcuit combined.
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 6:30 am
by plynn41
cmotodad wrote:I use a PC but have used a Gnarly too.My motor is stock and I prefer the PC as it seems smoother when the track dries out. What type or who did the port work for you? Thanks Bob
Home porting--I haven't done it yet. Will simply add a few degrees to the exhaust for more overrev. It will be milder than my '85 engine in the '88 chassis.
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 6:31 am
by plynn41
dannygraves wrote:the pc will give you more high end rip and so probably getter throttle control.
That sounds like what I'm looking for. Thanks!
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 6:35 am
by plynn41
knobby668 wrote:Give the DEP a try. It runs like a FMF and Pro Curcuit combined.
Sounds too good to be true, and I like the looks of the steel finished pipe. Is this seat dyno talk, or is there hard proof somewhere? Anyone else run a DEP?
Thanks everyone!
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 7:14 am
by Roostius_Maximus
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 7:24 am
by Roostius_Maximus
I can't give you proper feedback on mx track feel
I havent even rode the bike without an extention other than up and down the driveway
DEP pipes are more $, thinner material by the feel of it, and crappy on quality controll. This is pipe #2, the original I was sent came from england, was dinged and scratched bad before it was even plated. When the new one arrived i compared the two and the finish didnt even look like it was the same brand

.
The motor i have it on makes it completely useless to use as a comparison also, there are members here who have them, i'll give them a push to post up. (mr2ace where are you?)
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 8:00 am
by nmdesertrider
scored an old fatty off ebay for 50$, will let you know when i try it out
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 9:13 am
by plynn41
I haven't been able to find a fatty anywhere

.
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 9:14 am
by plynn41
Dang! That's a sweet looking bike.
Roostius_Maximus wrote:
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 11:49 am
by Roostius_Maximus
thanks! I bought 4 different seat covers, wasnt happy with any of them so i bought a stock 04 250 cover that i have yet to put on. I have black DNA wheels sitting upstairs for it, havent even mounted a tire

Posted: July 16th, 2011, 2:28 pm
by Kuma
Roostius_Maximus wrote:DEP pipes are more $, thinner material by the feel of it, and crappy on quality controll.
I spent a little time speeking with Bill of Bill's pipes about the old days and pipes, one of the things he mentioned that stuck in my head is that the works factory pipes are made from thinner material and make more power, from the sound of it quite a bit more power. the down side is that they only last one race before they crack

Posted: July 16th, 2011, 3:21 pm
by plynn41
Kuma wrote:I spent a little time speeking with Bill of Bill's pipes about the old days and pipes, one of the things he mentioned that stuck in my head is that the works factory pipes are made from thinner material and make more power, from the sound of it quite a bit more power. the down side is that they only last one race before they crack

Well, I don't need that! PC is looking pretty good right now.
And Roosty, I wasn't going to say anything about the dented up rear rim...
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 5:12 pm
by 2strokeforever
im gonna stick with the gnarly cause its thicker.... and hopefully i get better mileage cause its a low end pipe.... still revs to the moon with proper jetting, fresh silencer packing, reeds, and compression
11500rpm
Posted: July 16th, 2011, 5:47 pm
by Roostius_Maximus
thats a bills silencer

Posted: July 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
by hoofarted
nmdesertrider wrote:scored an old fatty off ebay for 50$, will let you know when i try it out
Odds are you will like it. More bottom than the PC and rips better up top. You do sacrifice a tad on bottom compared to the gnarly.
Posted: July 19th, 2011, 7:48 pm
by 4Z
2strokeforever wrote:im gonna stick with the gnarly cause its thicker.... and hopefully i get better mileage cause its a low end pipe.... still revs to the moon with proper jetting, fresh silencer packing, reeds, and compression
11500rpm
X2
Posted: July 19th, 2011, 10:20 pm
by Kuma
2strokeforever wrote:im gonna stick with the gnarly cause its thicker.... and hopefully i get better mileage cause its a low end pipe.... still revs to the moon with proper jetting, fresh silencer packing, reeds, and compression
11500rpm
Would you happen to have a dyno sheet on this motor? that seems like a lot of R's for these motors
Posted: July 19th, 2011, 10:49 pm
by 2strokeforever
roosty should, revs verified with a tach, well past the overrev but it will spin it