Good.

britincali · Post by **britincali** » January 14th, 2009, 1:35 pm

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28655143/?GT1=43001

MICK · Post by **MICK** » January 14th, 2009, 1:59 pm

I think it's kind of chicken shit to take somebody's kids over a name?? Not to defend the parents, they're clearling fucking retarded and should have been sterilized before conceiving children in the first place. Instead of banning weapons...maybe we shoud ban dumb fucks from reproducing. Just saying...

teemtrubble · Post by **teemtrubble** » January 14th, 2009, 2:01 pm

MICK wrote:I think it's kind of chicken shit to take somebody's kids over a name?? Not to defend the parents, they're clearling fucking retarded and should have been sterilized before conceiving children in the first place. Instead of banning weapons...maybe we shoud ban dumb fucks from reproducing. Just saying...

X2

Hellbear · Post by **Hellbear** » January 14th, 2009, 2:05 pm

teemtrubble wrote:
MICK wrote:I think it's kind of chicken shit to take somebody's kids over a name?? Not to defend the parents, they're clearling fucking retarded and should have been sterilized before conceiving children in the first place. Instead of banning weapons...maybe we shoud ban dumb fucks from reproducing. Just saying...
X2

X3!!!

I think it was in Father of the Bride there was a saying that Keanu Reeves says. It's "You need a license to drive but any butt reaming asshole can have a kid." It sucks but is true.

redrocket190 · Post by **redrocket190** » January 14th, 2009, 4:25 pm

I am sure there is more to this than just this story, but it does seem over-reaching (again) on the part of the local authorities. Anyone surprised?

iggys-amsoil · Post by **iggys-amsoil** » January 14th, 2009, 4:27 pm

X4

Heard about that last week. UnF'in believeable.

lewisclan · Post by **lewisclan** » January 14th, 2009, 5:43 pm

iggys-amsoil wrote:X4

Heard about that last week. UnF'in believeable.

x5

Post by **AlisoBob** » January 14th, 2009, 5:50 pm

redrocket190 wrote:I am sure there is more to this than just this story, but it does seem over-reaching (again) on the part of the local authorities. Anyone surprised?

What about a kid named " Jesus", or "Damian"

????

F- the gov....

iggys-amsoil · Post by **iggys-amsoil** » January 14th, 2009, 6:16 pm

redrocket190 wrote: it is over-reaching (again) on the part of the local authorities. Anyone surprised?

No. and your right.

Jesus in these parts is pronounced as an H.

sabreguy · Post by **sabreguy** » January 14th, 2009, 7:23 pm

We deal with the kids that are taking away from their parents. I would hope that a name isn't the real reason those kids were taken. Most of the kids we have had are in the system because of neglect.

TYSTYX · Post by **TYSTYX** » January 15th, 2009, 5:58 pm

Parenthood, not Father of the Bride....:

BannedCR500Riders.com

Good.

Good.